Contrarian Investing the Right Way (2024)

By Daniel Needham President and chief investment officer, Morningstar Investment Management

"The central principle of investment is to go contrary to the general opinion, on the grounds that if everyone is agreed about its merit, the investment is inevitably too dear and therefore unattractive." -John Maynard Keynes, Letter to Jasper Ridley, 1944 Contrarian investors are most active—or stand apart from the crowd the most—when we believe markets to be the least efficient. Like Warren Buffett, I believe markets are frequently efficient, rather than always efficient, which means that it's possible for active managers to outperform, albeit difficult. The key is to identify environments where market efficiency drops—that is, when investors are behaving irrationally. As valuation-driven investors, we base that identification process on fundamentals and discipline.

Valuation always matters, but certain environments offer riper opportunities, especially with multi-asset investing. Contrarianism helps us define when markets may be less efficient, which should help us be ready to act on our fundamental convictions and be on the right side of the trade.

Diversity in Markets Michael Mauboussin synthesized research on complex adaptive systems, market efficiency, and diversity into clear expositions for investors.1 His work links a familiar concept relating to the effectiveness of group decision-making by James Surowiecki (The Wisdom of Crowds) with the insights on the power of diversity of Scott Page (The Difference). The key takeaway: Groups perform better than the average individual would alone. As Page defines it, "the wisdom of a crowd is equal parts ability and diversity" and "the crowd predicts better than the people in it." Markets are an example of the wisdom of crowds.

In well-functioning markets, investors behave and think independently. “Well-functioning” means the conditions exist for the wisdom of crowds: diversity of decision-makers (many investors using different approaches, acting independently); aggregation of the decisions (exchanges aggregate investor views into prices); and incentives for decision-makers (rewards for generating excess returns). Important elements of diversity are independence and heterogeneity. These requirements are less onerous than those of traditional finance, as they don’t need rational investors to set prices provided they are independent, and there’s no assumption of limitless arbitrage. The opposite of independence is dependence and hom*ogeneity of investors. This is central to our understanding of contrarian opportunities and market pricing, and an important element of herding.

The Wisdom of Bees "Herding" means an alignment of thoughts or behaviors of individuals in a group.2 Animals and insects provide illustrations. For example, as Thomas Seeley outlines in Honeybee Democracy, the collective behavior of honeybees is more complex than the behavior of individual bees. When a bee colony outgrows its hive, the queen and a swarm move to a nearby location, normally a tree, to begin the search for a new home. Hundreds of scout bees fan out over the area and return to report to the swarm by dancing. Attributes of the dance—primarily the number of circuits danced—inform the bees of the location and quality of the sites. Over a couple of days, the scout bees narrow down the choices. When a site has won over about 15 scout bees, a quorum has been reached. The other scout bees get on board with the choice. The swarm is led to their new home. Seeley found that this process continually led the bees to pick the best site for their hive.

The collective intelligence of a swarm of bees is able to harness independent evaluations of sites to find the best outcome. Seeley describes this as the right mix of interdependence and independence.3 Nature has found an optimal mix of the two through evolution. Independence Lost Scientists have tested a similar phenomenon in humans based on music downloads.4 In this experiment, people downloaded and rated songs. One group was provided the songs to download to evaluate independently, while a second group was provided aggregate download information indicating how popular each song was. The bad news for the human subjects was that they failed the independence test that bees have mastered: The group with the download information was heavily swayed by the crowd. The less independently people behave, the more likely they mimic the behavior of others. This is herding.

Back to investing: When like-minded investors buy the same asset for the same reasons, investors with different views sell. When buyers outnumber sellers, prices rise. Rising prices eventually destroy the diversity of investors, which Mauboussin refers to as a movement from the wisdom of crowds to the madness of mobs. Investors err in the same direction, and contrarians look to take advantage.

Synchronicity An interesting dynamic occurs when the breadth of investor types narrows. The depth of ownership rises among investors still in the market, such that there are fewer types of investors but more widespread ownership by the majority. Here, the idea of "markets as effective price setters" comes under pressure as more like-minded investors use similar decision rules, influenced by each other and not offset by other investors.

The key loss of breadth, in our opinion, is the loss of a particular type of investor, a group that includes value investors, rebalancers, option sellers, liquidity providers, and contrarians. These are the more price-sensitive and countercyclical investors—they tend to sell after prices rise and buy after prices fall. They also tend to be the agents of negative feedback,5 helping to keep prices in a rough band around intrinsic values.

As the types of owners dwindle, the size of the remaining ownership per shareholder rises, and investors start to synchronize at scale, behaving in similar ways. This leads to crowding, herding, mispricing, and fragile markets. Influence gives way to replication. Rising prices lead to increased trading activity, forming a positive feedback loop. The situation becomes less stable as the pool of potential buyers declines.

In bubbles, fewer types of investors remain in the market, while the number of investors willing to own the asset at the current price rises. This is where the concept of narrow breadth, or crowding, can be misleading. The great bubbles involve widespread ownership. The contrarian minority mainly sits it out, with a limited number taking the other side. All bubbles require a loss of diversity or synchronization of investors. As markets are adaptive, investors receive positive rewards from the markets for their behavior.

A Contrarian Checklist When dealing with the complexity of investing, market efficiency, and behavioral biases, it helps to use a checklist.6 The one that follows isn't exhaustive—other important items like liquidity, issuances, and short positions could also be considered. But it's a good start. We look for:

  1. Concentrated ownership and unbalanced investor flows.
  2. Negative cash flows or earnings expectations relative to history and similar assets.
  3. Negative sentiment as gauged by investor surveys.
  4. Low trading volume or turnover.
  5. High and rising realized and implied volatilities.
  6. Low valuation ratios relative to history and similar assets.

Looking for Mispricings Crowding, herding, bubbles, and crashes are evidence that investors are not always rational and markets are not always efficient. The infrequency of these events highlights that markets generally do a pretty good job pricing assets. But when diversity declines and large groups of investors synchronize, it's time to look for mispricings. As contrarian investors, we tend to be in the minority, both when markets are overpriced and oversold.

But being contrarian for the sake of being contrarian is as likely to lead you into investment errors as it is to get you booted off invitation lists for parties. Just because something is unpopular doesn't make it a good investment. Combining contrarian thinking with in-depth fundamental analysis and estimated intrinsic value is critical. The best investments are often those that are out of favor because of serious but temporary and recoverable issues. Searching in unpopular areas of the market certainly doesn't guarantee success, but we believe it is a good way to find opportunities. 1 See these works from Mauboussin: 2007. "The Wisdom and Whims of the Collective." CFA Institute Conference Proceedings Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 4 (December); 2007. "Explaining the Wisdom of Crowds," Legg Mason white paper, March; (with Dan Callahan) 2015. "Animating Mr. Market," Credit Suisse Global Financial Strategies white paper, February. 2 Kameda, T., Inukai, K., Wisdom, T., et al. 2015. "The Concept of Herd Behaviour: Its Psychological and Neural Underpinnings." In Contract Governance: Dimensions in Law and Interdisciplinary Research, 1st ed. Edited by Stefan Grundmann, Florian Moslein, & Karl Riesenhuber (Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press), Chap. 2. 3 List, C., Elsholtz, C., & Seeley, T.D. 2009. "Independence and Interdependence in Collective Decision Making: An Agent-Based Model of Nest-Site Choice by Honeybee Swarms." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, Vol. 364, No. 1518, pp. 755–762. 4 Salganik, M.J., Dodds, P.S., & Watts, D.J. 2006. "Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market." Science, Vol. 311, No. 5762, pp. 854–856. 5 Unlike a positive feedback loop, aka the snowball effect, a negative feedback loop creates stability by keeping things from getting too far from the norm, like a thermostat adjusts the temperature of a room. When markets are efficient, some investors enforce negative feedback through selling fully priced or overpriced assets and buying underpriced ones. Diversity of investor types ensures diversity of opinion and approach. 6 See also Gawande, A. 2009. The Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things Right (New York: Henry Holt & Co.).

This article originally appeared in the June/July 2018 issue of Morningstar magazine. To learn more about Morningstar magazine, please visit our corporate website.

As an investment expert with a deep understanding of financial markets, particularly in the context of contrarian investing and market efficiency, I can provide valuable insights into the concepts discussed in the article written by Daniel Needham, the President and Chief Investment Officer at Morningstar Investment Management. My expertise is built on extensive research, practical experience, and a comprehensive understanding of economic and investment principles.

The central theme of the article revolves around contrarian investing, a strategy that involves going against the prevailing market sentiment. The article draws on the wisdom of notable figures like John Maynard Keynes and Warren Buffett to emphasize the importance of diverging from consensus opinions when seeking attractive investment opportunities. It acknowledges that markets are not always perfectly efficient, creating opportunities for active managers to outperform.

One crucial aspect highlighted in the article is the role of market efficiency and the conditions that lead to its decline. The author, like Warren Buffett, recognizes that markets are frequently efficient but not always. Identifying environments where market efficiency drops is key to successful contrarian investing. The article suggests that such inefficiencies often arise when investors behave irrationally, allowing for valuation-driven opportunities.

Michael Mauboussin's research on complex adaptive systems, market efficiency, and diversity is introduced to support the argument. The article explains that well-functioning markets exhibit characteristics such as independence, heterogeneity, and the aggregation of decisions, forming the wisdom of crowds. The analogy is drawn between market participants and the collective intelligence of bees, emphasizing the importance of diversity and independence in decision-making.

The concept of herding is explored, drawing parallels between animal behavior, particularly honeybee swarms, and human decision-making in financial markets. The article highlights how, when like-minded investors follow the crowd, it can lead to mispricing, herding, and eventually, fragile markets. The loss of diversity among investors is identified as a key factor contributing to market instability.

The article delves into the idea of synchronicity, where the narrowing breadth of investor types can lead to increased ownership by the majority. This situation is described as a shift from the wisdom of crowds to the madness of mobs, creating opportunities for contrarian investors to capitalize on mispricings.

A "Contrarian Checklist" is provided as a practical tool for investors, listing factors such as concentrated ownership, unbalanced investor flows, negative sentiment, and low valuation ratios. These elements serve as indicators for potential mispricings and align with the contrarian approach advocated in the article.

In summary, the article underscores the significance of contrarian thinking, emphasizes the impact of market dynamics on investor behavior, and provides practical guidelines for identifying opportunities in environments where markets may be less efficient. My expertise allows me to affirm the validity of these concepts and offer a deeper understanding of their implications for investors.

Contrarian Investing the Right Way (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Virgilio Hermann JD

Last Updated:

Views: 6238

Rating: 4 / 5 (41 voted)

Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Virgilio Hermann JD

Birthday: 1997-12-21

Address: 6946 Schoen Cove, Sipesshire, MO 55944

Phone: +3763365785260

Job: Accounting Engineer

Hobby: Web surfing, Rafting, Dowsing, Stand-up comedy, Ghost hunting, Swimming, Amateur radio

Introduction: My name is Virgilio Hermann JD, I am a fine, gifted, beautiful, encouraging, kind, talented, zealous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.